douglasmkelly's posterous

The Well Rounded Designer Geek 
« Back to blog

Should Large Companies Forget About Customer Service?

FIFA World Cup LogoWith the exit of The US from Soccer's biggest event, World Cup, this past weekend, I decided to finish writing this post about The ESPN. ESPN has touted the previous US game where they beat Algeria to go on to the round of 16, as having a viewership of 1.1 million people in the US. Before I lay into my diatribe, let me say that ESPN's free iPhone App is cool. It gives scores, schedule, and the brackets in real time. I wouldn't be surprised the pay-for-app has real time play by play like FIFA's site. I value the fact that they are covering World Cup with out all the life stories about the athletes like NBC does for the Olympics.

ESPN's initial coverage of the start of World Cup was ok. They hired some of the brightest commentators to help explain soccer to the uninitiated and comment on the matches for the avid fan alike. This year's World Cup is being played in South Africa, in case you've not heard. Most games started at 8:30 in the A.M. here (they're ½ a world away... I understand the logistics). I don't know about many of you, reading this today, but I'm in the US's EST zone. I'm generally working at 8:30a. Yes I know about TiVo, and actually have a machine expressly purchased to record TV, but it's not hooked up yet. Time issues.

So when I noted that many of the games were to be re-broadcast in the evenings, I was happy. I sat down in my favorite spot to watch the Netherlands play at 8:30 PM., and grabbed the laptop to work during the game. I tuned in to ESPN to see the game as listed in the schedule, but was delivered a college baseball game between Texas A&M and Dartmouth. "What the...." First I called Dish Networks. ESPN had listed notices during the games that they would be re-aired. They showed it in their schedule! Dish explained they had no control over ESPN's coverage of anything, but that they'd log a complaint on my behalf.

I went on to ESPN's site to ask why, in all things holy, they would do this. They responded with an automated boiler-plated message, that "We have all the Soccer World Cup Games" - Great! Just the message that I wanted to smooth my fur back down. I was given an email address in their message, to which I replied:

I live close to the largest population of Dutch people outside of the Netherlands. You aired a baseball game in an area that could care less about Texas A&M or Dartmouth. I'm sure there were about 7 people in the greater Grand Rapids Area (Near Holland MI), that tuned in just for that game, but how could they have know it was on, WHEN YOUR SCHEDULE LISTED WORLD CUP SOCCER?!!. I might be estimating high. There are at least 500,000 people in the West Michigan Area that are of Dutch Decent. You pulled your own listed coverage of the biggest sporting event in the world for something that only a few people care about: College Baseball. I could *maybe* see if it was between Michigan State and the U of M. I could see if it was The Masters. I could even see if it was a local high school tournament soccer game. I wouldn't have been happy, but wouldn't be this angry.

ESPN sent me a followup message Thursday saying the same thing. No apology. No explanation. Just "The Netherlands vs. Denmark match re-aired at 6pm ET on Monday, June 14th 2010 on ESPN Classic." That's it. One line. They didn't even refer to the above.

I know that ESPN is the largest sporting network in the world. But when you say you're going to do something, and you don't deliver, and then you can't even respond to concerns adequately, sometimes you have to talk about it. Yes, I consult people to write positive Tweets and respond to comments positively. To post things that you'd want your grand mother to read on Facebook. That blog posts should be constructive. I also comment on Customer Service on this blog. So let me tell you about some good customer service in all this:

Customer ServiceThe day after I called Dish Networks, where I had actually talked to a real person, they called to follow up! Seriously! "Did we fix all your problems?" So where ESPN fell down and still has yet to get back up with regards to Customer Support and Service, Dish has done a bicycle kick shot on goal. They let me know that, yes for more money, I could order an "Enhanced" package to watch the replay games on Classic. I know that's an up-sell. But the Customer Service is worth it.

So is the fact the ESPN is so big, and they're getting a million+ viewers mean that they need to disregard my issue? You tell me. How many of those 1.1mil were watching via Dish Networks? How many missed the Netherlands first game? Are we all going to let ESPN go on this one? I'm not. I value good customer service. I try to provide great customer service. Tell me, reader. Is customer service valued by you?

EAVB_SYYWBIDRYY and EAVB_CYAGELEPQX

Posted by Douglas Kelly 

Comments (7)

Jun 28, 2010
Douglas Kelly said...
Since this just came in, I thought I'd share an additional email message from ESPN:
"We appreciate your taking the time to share your thoughts with us. We’ll be sure to pass your comments on to the appropriate personnel for their review and consideration."
Again no apology - No explanation - Nothing but a thanks. Is the Legal Dept at ESPN controlling customer service? Shouldn't PR be taking the lead on this?
Jun 28, 2010
imaclurg said...
ouch... At least you can watch them all online at Univision... I know it's spanish commentating, but at least it's live.
Jun 28, 2010
 said...
Watching the games later in the day on ESPN Classic has been nice (when I forget to DVR). It would be confusing if you were expecting the replay to happen on ESPN itself rather than on ESPN Classic. One of the problems that come with multiple ESPN channels.

As for their response, it's pretty typical of what you can expect from a lot of "big" companies these days. I say "big" because I don't think they have a ton of free people running around to answer questions (TV is ultra competitive these days). Lots of companies are automating all responses and losing the human touch required to discern customers "on the edge." Too bad, really, because probably a lot of customers are being lost as a result.

If that's the case, then, it's paramount for the organization to be ultra-clear in its communications up-front. If expectations are clearly set, there's little chance customers will be disappointed.

Jun 29, 2010
Douglas Kelly said...
Thanks for the comments. I think that ESPN has stepped their coverage since the first week as they saw viewership numbers. And in the first week ESPN's schedule showed their primary channel as the one replaying the game, not Classic. I'm still very surprised at their weak response.

Ian, I used to watch World Cup on Univisíon back in the 90s... "Gooooooooaaaaaalll"

Jun 29, 2010
Douglas Kelly liked this post.
Jul 07, 2010
evolvesolutions said...
From @mollask: ESPN has yet to respond to my latest email. This further cements that ESPN has gotten too big to provide good customer service. #worldcup #CustomerServiceFail
Jul 28, 2010
mollask said...
Final Followup: ESPN completely ignored my emails after July the 6th. World Cup came to a close. They now have 4 years to fix things. Good Luck ESPN - I'm sure something more robust than Twitter or with more users will be around in 2014.

Leave a comment...